Final, Fall 2016
McGill University, MATH 141Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
We need to evaluate the definite integral of the function over the interval . This involves finding the antiderivative of and evaluating it at the upper and lower limits of integration using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2.
We need to find a function such that its derivative is equal to .
Remember the basic derivative rules for trigonometric functions: the derivative of is . Therefore, the antiderivative of is , because the derivative of is .
So, the antiderivative is .
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2, states that if is an antiderivative of , then:
In our case, , , , and .
Now we need to evaluate at the upper limit and the lower limit .
Recall the values of cosine at these key angles: and .
Substitute these values into the expression:
The value of the definite integral is 1.
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
We need to compute the indefinite integral . The integrand involves a function inside a square root, , and its derivative (up to a constant factor), , is present as the term outside the square root. This structure suggests using integration by substitution (u-substitution).
Let be the inner function:
Now, find the differential by differentiating with respect to :
Rearrange to solve for :
Notice that our integral has , not . We can solve the differential equation for : . This allows us to substitute perfectly.
Rewrite the original integral using and .
Substitute and :
Now integrate using the power rule for integration: (for ).
Here, , so .
Don't forget the constant of integration, , when computing indefinite integrals!
Replace with its expression in terms of , which is .
The indefinite integral is:
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
We need to compute the definite integral . The integrand is a product of a polynomial function () and an exponential function (). Standard u-substitution doesn't apply easily. This suggests using integration by parts. The formula is .
We need to choose and . Using the LIPET/LIATE guideline (Polynomial comes before Exponential), we choose:
Let and .
Then we find by differentiating , and by integrating :
Now apply the integration by parts formula:
Notice that the new integral is still a product of a polynomial () and an exponential (). This means we need to apply integration by parts a second time.
Let's evaluate the new integral using integration by parts again.
Choose and .
Then and .
Apply the formula :
Substitute the result from Step 3 back into the expression from Step 2:
So, the antiderivative is .
Now we evaluate the definite integral using the limits and .
First, calculate :
Next, calculate :
Remember that . This is a common point where errors can occur.
Finally, compute :
The value of the definite integral is .
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
We need to compute the derivative of a definite integral where the upper limit of integration is a function of . This requires the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 1 (FTC Part 1) combined with the Chain Rule.
FTC Part 1 states: .
When the upper limit is a function , the combined formula is:
Think of it like this: FTC Part 1 gives you , and then the Chain Rule requires you to multiply by the derivative of the upper limit.
In our problem :
The lower limit is a constant: .
The integrand function is: .
The upper limit is a function of : .
First, find the derivative of the upper limit, :
Next, evaluate the integrand at the upper limit :
Now, substitute these pieces into the combined formula :
It's conventional to write the polynomial factor first.
Note that the lower limit being a constant doesn't affect the result when differentiating with respect to x. If the lower limit were also a function of x, the formula would be .
The derivative is .
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The integrand is . We can simplify the numerator using the double angle identity for sine:
Recall the identity: .
Substituting this into the integral expression gives:
So the integral becomes:
Look at the modified integrand . Let's check the derivative of the denominator using the chain rule:
The derivative of the denominator is , which is the negative of the numerator (). This confirms that integration by substitution (u-substitution) is the appropriate technique, matching the pattern .
Let be the denominator:
Find the differential :
Rewrite the integral in terms of . We have . The numerator and differential term is . Comparing this to , we see that:
Substitute these into the integral:
Integrate with respect to :
Remember the integration rule: .
Applying this rule:
Replace with its expression in terms of , which is :
Since , the term is always positive (). Therefore, the absolute value signs are not strictly necessary.
The indefinite integral is:
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
We need to compute the indefinite integral . The integrand is a product of powers of tangent and secant. We should look for a possible u-substitution.
Recall the derivatives of tangent and secant: and .
Since the derivative of is , and we have a factor in the integrand, the substitution is the most direct approach.
Let .
Find the differential :
Now substitute for and for in the integral:
The integral is now a simple power function of . Integrate using the power rule for integration: .
Here, , so .
Replace with its expression in terms of , which is .
The indefinite integral is:
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The integral is . An integral can be improper if the integrand has an infinite discontinuity within the interval of integration or at its endpoints. This happens when the denominator is zero.
Factor the denominator:
The denominator is zero when or .
The interval of integration is .
The value lies within this interval ().
The value is outside this interval.
Since there is an infinite discontinuity at , which is inside the interval , this is an improper integral of Type 2.
To analyze convergence, we must split the integral into two parts at the point of discontinuity, :
The original integral converges if and only if *both* of these new integrals converge. If either one diverges, the original integral diverges. Let's analyze the first part, .
We can use the Limit Comparison Test (LCT) for improper integrals to determine convergence or divergence without calculating the integral's value. We need to compare our integrand, , to a simpler function whose convergence behavior near is known.
As , the factor approaches . So, the integrand behaves like . This suggests comparing with:
The key idea for LCT is to choose a comparison function that captures the "most problematic" part of near the discontinuity. Here, the term causes the division by zero.
Calculate the limit of the ratio as approaches the discontinuity (from the left, for the first integral):
Since the limit is a finite positive number (), the LCT states that and have the same convergence behavior (they either both converge or both diverge).
Now we need to determine if the comparison integral converges or diverges.
This is a p-integral with a discontinuity at the upper endpoint. Let . As , . The integral behaves like .
In our case, , the power is .
An improper integral of the form or converges if and diverges if .
Since , the integral diverges.
Based on the LCT:
1. We compared with .
2. The limit of the ratio of their integrands as was (finite and positive).
3. The comparison integral diverges (since ).
Therefore, the integral also diverges.
Since one of the parts () diverges, the original integral must also diverge. There is no need to check the convergence of the second part ().
Beyond the steps to solve this specific problem, what's the bigger picture?
1. Spotting the Trouble: When integrating a fraction, always check if the denominator can be zero within your integration bounds. If it can, like being zero at in the interval , you've found a vertical asymptote. This means the function value shoots off to infinity, and you're dealing with an improper integral.
2. Does Infinite Height Mean Infinite Area? Not always! A function can go to infinity, but the area underneath it might still be a finite number. Think about : goes to infinity at , but the integral converges (area is finite).
3. It's All About Speed (the Power 'p'): What really matters is *how fast* the function runs towards infinity near the asymptote. This speed is determined by the power on the factor causing the problem. Near our asymptote , our function behaves like . The critical factor is raised to the power .
4. The p-Test Threshold: There's a crucial rule for integrals near an asymptote that behave like :
* If , the function grows too fast; the area is infinite (integral diverges).
* If , the function grows slowly enough; the area is finite (integral converges).
Our example had , which is right on the edge, and it diverges. This is the same reason the harmonic series diverges. If the factor had been (so ), the integral would have converged. If it had been (so ), it would also diverge.
5. Why Factoring and LCT are Useful: Factoring the denominator helps you find the asymptotes and identify the crucial power . The Limit Comparison Test (LCT) is a tool that formalizes the idea of "behaves like". It lets you compare your complicated function to the simpler form near the asymptote to determine convergence or divergence without actually finding the antiderivative.
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The integral is . Since the upper limit of integration is , this is an improper integral of Type 1.
Let . We need to understand its behavior, especially as .
The term oscillates as increases, since goes to infinity. However, we know that the sine function is always bounded:
So, for , we have .
This allows us to bound the term :
The exponential term is always positive for real .
Therefore, we can bound the entire integrand :
Multiply the inequality by :
This inequality holds for all .
We have found that our integrand is non-negative and is less than or equal to . This setup is ideal for the Direct Comparison Test for improper integrals.
The Direct Comparison Test states: If for , then if converges, must also converge.
Our comparison function is .
We need to determine if the integral of the comparison function, , converges or diverges.
This is a standard exponential integral. We can evaluate it directly:
As , , so . Also, .
Since the limit is a finite number (1), the integral converges.
Alternatively, you might know that converges for any constant . Here , so converges, and multiplying by 2 doesn't change convergence.
We established:
1. for all .
2. converges.
According to the Direct Comparison Test, since our function's integral is bounded above by a convergent integral, our integral must also converge.
The integral converges by the Direct Comparison Test, comparing it with the convergent integral .
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
Let the terms of the series be .
We need to determine if the infinite series converges or diverges.
First, consider the terms . Since , . The term , so . The denominator . Therefore, all terms are positive (). This allows us to use comparison tests.
The term oscillates, which can make tests like the Limit Comparison Test difficult if the limit doesn't exist. However, we know the cosine function is bounded.
Recall that . Squaring gives .
Therefore, the term is bounded:
We can use the upper bound to establish an inequality for :
Now, we can simplify this further by noting that for , . Therefore, .
So, we have established that for all .
This suggests comparing our series to the series .
Let . The comparison series is .
This can be written as .
The series is a p-series with .
Recall that a p-series converges if and diverges if .
Since , the p-series converges.
Therefore, the comparison series also converges (multiplying by a constant doesn't affect convergence).
We have shown that:
1. for all , where and .
2. The series converges.
The Direct Comparison Test (DCT) states that if for all sufficiently large , and converges, then must also converge.
Think of it like this: If the terms of your series () are always positive but smaller than the terms of a series that adds up to a finite number (), then your series must also add up to a finite number.
Since both conditions of the DCT are met, our series converges.
The series converges based on the Direct Comparison Test with the convergent p-series .
The series converges by the Direct Comparison Test.
The series converges by the Direct Comparison Test.
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
Let the terms of the series be .
We need to determine if the infinite series converges or diverges.
For , the numerator is positive and the denominator is positive. Therefore, all terms are positive (). This allows us to use comparison tests.
To choose a suitable comparison series, we examine the behavior of for large . We look at the highest powers of in the numerator and denominator.
Numerator:
Denominator:
So, for large , behaves like:
This suggests comparing our series to a p-series with .
Based on the behavior for large , we choose the comparison series where
Since and are positive, we can use the Limit Comparison Test (LCT).
The LCT is often effective for series whose terms are ratios of polynomials or involve roots of polynomials, as it focuses on the dominant terms for large .
We need to compute the limit .
Now, divide both the numerator and the denominator by the highest power of in the denominator, which is . Inside the square root, dividing by is equivalent to dividing by .
As , terms like , , and go to 0.
The limit is finite and positive (). Therefore, the LCT states that our series and the comparison series either both converge or both diverge.
The comparison series is . This is a p-series with .
Recall that a p-series converges if and diverges if .
Since , which is greater than 1, the comparison series converges.
Because converges and , the original series must also converge by the Limit Comparison Test.
The series converges by the Limit Comparison Test with the convergent p-series .
The series converges by the Limit Comparison Test with the convergent p-series .
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The series is . The presence of the factor indicates this is an alternating series.
We will use the Alternating Series Test (AST).
The series has the form , where the term is:
The AST requires us to check three conditions for :
1. for sufficiently large .
2. .
3. is non-increasing () for sufficiently large .
Condition 1: Positivity
For , , so . The arcsine function, , is defined and positive for . Therefore, for all . This condition holds.
Condition 2: Limit is Zero
We evaluate the limit of as :
As , the argument . Since is continuous at :
This condition holds.
Condition 3: Non-increasing Terms
We need to determine if for sufficiently large . That is, is ?
Consider the function for .
We know that for :
Squaring both sides (since both are positive):
Taking reciprocals reverses the inequality:
Since , both and are in the interval . The function is strictly increasing on the interval . Therefore:
So, for all . The sequence is strictly decreasing. This condition holds.
The key facts used here are that is decreasing for positive , and is an increasing function on its domain.
Since all three conditions of the Alternating Series Test are satisfied:
1. for .
2. .
3. for .
The Alternating Series Test guarantees that the series converges.
The series converges by the Alternating Series Test.
The series converges by the Alternating Series Test.
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
We want to divide by .
The initial setup is:
___________
x^2+2 | x^3 + 5x^2 - 2x + 1
1. First term of quotient: Divide the leading term of the dividend () by the leading term of the divisor (): . Write in the quotient area.
x
___________
x^2+2 | x^3 + 5x^2 - 2x + 1
2. First multiplication: Multiply the term by the entire divisor (): . Write this result below the dividend, aligning terms by power.
x
___________
x^2+2 | x^3 + 5x^2 - 2x + 1
x^3 + 2x
3. First subtraction: Subtract the result from the dividend. Draw a line and write the result below. Remember to subtract corresponding terms: , , . Bring down the next term () from the dividend.
x
___________
x^2+2 | x^3 + 5x^2 - 2x + 1
-(x^3 + 2x)
________________
5x^2 - 4x + 1
4. Second term of quotient: Divide the leading term of the new remainder () by the leading term of the divisor (): . Write in the quotient area.
x + 5
___________
x^2+2 | x^3 + 5x^2 - 2x + 1
-(x^3 + 2x)
________________
5x^2 - 4x + 1
5. Second multiplication: Multiply the term by the divisor (): . Write this result below the current remainder, aligning terms.
x + 5
___________
x^2+2 | x^3 + 5x^2 - 2x + 1
-(x^3 + 2x)
________________
5x^2 - 4x + 1
5x^2 + 10
6. Second subtraction: Subtract the result from . Draw a line and write the final result. , , . The result is .
x + 5 <-- Quotient s(x)
___________
x^2+2 | x^3 + 5x^2 - 2x + 1
-(x^3 + 2x)
________________
5x^2 - 4x + 1
-(5x^2 + 10)
____________
-4x - 9 <-- Remainder r(x)
The degree of this result (, degree 1) is less than the degree of the divisor (, degree 2), so the algorithm stops.
Double-check each subtraction step carefully, especially handling signs and aligning terms correctly (like the under and under ).
From the final division layout:
The quotient is .
The remainder is .
The degree of is 1, which is less than the degree of the divisor (). The condition is satisfied.
The result is: .
Using polynomial long division, we found the quotient and the remainder . The degree of is 1, which is less than 2.
So, .
Using polynomial long division, we found the quotient and the remainder . The degree of is 1, which is less than 2.
So, .
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
Using the quotient and remainder found previously, we rewrite the integrand:
We can split this into the sum of two integrals:
The first integral is a simple polynomial integration:
The second integral involves the proper rational function . Since the denominator is an irreducible quadratic, we split the fraction based on the derivative of the denominator and a constant term. The derivative of is .
This split is strategic: the first part () can be solved with a u-substitution for the denominator, leading to a logarithm. The second part () matches the arctangent integration form.
Use u-substitution. Let . Then , which means .
(Absolute value is dropped since is always positive).
Therefore, the first part of the rational integral evaluates to .
This matches the arctangent integration formula .
Here, and , so .
Therefore, the second part of the rational integral evaluates to .
Combine the results from Step 2, Step 3a, and Step 3b. Don't forget a single constant of integration at the end. The integral is:
The integral evaluates to:
The integral evaluates to:
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The integral is .
The denominator contains . This looks similar to the form , which appears in the derivative of arcsin and arccos.
Let's try to match the form . We can write and . So, the term inside the square root is .
This suggests choosing and making the substitution .
Let's check the derivative: . The numerator of the integrand is , which is proportional to this derivative.
This confirms that u-substitution with is a good strategy, aiming for the arcsine integral form.
Let .
Find the differential :
Our integral contains the term . Solve for it from the differential:
Now substitute (so ) and into the integral:
The integral is now in a standard form.
Recall the integration rule involving arcsine: .
In our case, . Applying this rule:
Replace with its expression in terms of , which is .
The indefinite integral is . This result is concise enough for the KaTeX `\boxed{}`.
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
Total distance traveled over an interval is found by integrating the speed, which is the absolute value of velocity, .
Displacement, on the other hand, is . We need the total distance.
To evaluate , we first need to find where the velocity might change sign within the interval . This occurs where .
The velocity is zero at and .
The time is within our interval . This means the particle might change direction at , so we need to check the sign of on the subintervals and .
Check sign on : Choose a test value, e.g., .
Since , the velocity is negative on . Therefore, on this interval.
Check sign on : Choose a test value, e.g., .
Since , the velocity is positive on . Therefore, on this interval.
We split the integral for total distance at :
This splitting is crucial. Integrating directly from 0 to 3 would give displacement, not total distance. We integrate where velocity is negative and where velocity is positive.
Find the antiderivatives:
Antiderivative of is .
Antiderivative of is .
Evaluate the first integral:
Evaluate the second integral:
Add the results from the two integrals:
The total distance traveled by the particle from to is 8.
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
A parametric curve has a tangent line with slope . The slope is calculated using the derivatives with respect to the parameter :
A horizontal tangent line occurs when the slope is equal to zero. This happens when the numerator is zero, but the denominator is non-zero.
Condition for Horizontal Tangent: and .
If both and are zero at the same value of , the slope is indeterminate () and requires further analysis (it might be a cusp or corner, not a horizontal tangent).
Given the parametric equations:
Calculate the derivatives with respect to , using `align*` to suppress equation numbers:
Set the expression for equal to zero and solve for :
This equation holds if or .
The potential values of for a horizontal tangent are and .
We must ensure that the denominator is not also zero at and .
Use the expression .
Check :
Since at , the curve has a horizontal tangent line at .
Check :
Since at , the curve has a horizontal tangent line at .
Both values of where resulted in , so both correspond to horizontal tangents.
The values of at which the tangent line to the curve is horizontal are and .
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The definition of the definite integral as a limit of Riemann sums is:
Where:
- is the interval of integration.
- is the number of subintervals.
- is the width of each subinterval.
- is the sample point in the -th subinterval.
For the integral :
- The function is .
- The interval is .
- The width of each subinterval is .
- We are using right endpoints as sample points. The right endpoint of the -th subinterval is . The formula is .
We need .
Now substitute these components into the Riemann sum formula:
We can factor out terms that do not depend on the summation index :
The key here is to isolate the sum involving so we can apply standard summation formulas.
We use the formula for the sum of the first squares:
Substitute this into the expression for :
Splitting the fraction into factors , , makes taking the limit easier.
Finally, we compute the definite integral by taking the limit of the Riemann sum as :
As , the terms .
The value of the definite integral computed from the definition is .
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The formula for the area of a surface generated by rotating a curve from to about the x-axis is:
We need to ensure on the interval. Since involves positive terms, for all , so the condition holds.
The function is .
Its derivative is:
Where .
First, find :
Now, add 1:
Recall the fundamental identity for hyperbolic functions: . Rearranging gives .
Using this identity, we get a perfect square:
Now take the square root:
Since is always positive, .
This simplification is key, similar to how the square root might simplify in other surface area problems.
Substitute , , , and into the surface area formula:
To integrate , we use another hyperbolic identity.
Recall the power-reducing identity: .
Substitute this into the integral:
Now integrate term by term. Let be the antiderivative:
We need to evaluate .
Let's evaluate and separately:
Since :
Now substitute these back:
(You could also write as ).
The area of the surface of revolution is .
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
We need to differentiate with respect to .
Let . Then .
The chain rule states .
We have .
We need to find .
Find the derivative of with respect to .
Recall the derivatives: and .
We can factor out from this expression:
Now substitute and back into the chain rule formula:
Substitute back :
We have shown that .
Note: The assumption allows us to omit the absolute value within the logarithm for the differentiation step. The general antiderivative requires the absolute value: .
Since differentiation and integration are inverse processes, the result from Step 3 directly implies the indefinite integral formula:
We have shown by differentiation that . This confirms the indefinite integral formula:
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The integral is a standard but non-trivial integral involving a power of a trigonometric function. It's typically solved using Integration by Parts. The formula is .
To apply the formula, we need to split the integrand into two parts, and . A useful split is:
Let:
Now, find by differentiating , and find by integrating :
Choosing is strategic because its integral is simple.
Substitute into the formula :
The new integral is . We can simplify this using a trigonometric identity.
Use the identity .
Substitute this into the integral:
Substitute the result from Step 4 back into the equation from Step 3:
Distribute the negative sign:
Notice that the original integral appears on both sides. Add to both sides to collect them:
Now, divide by 2 to isolate the desired integral:
(Note: are used to size the parentheses correctly across lines).
In Part A, we confirmed the standard result:
Substitute this into our expression for . We only need one constant of integration at the end.
The indefinite integral of is:
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The formula for the arc length of a curve from to is:
The function is .
The derivative is:
Now, square the derivative and add 1:
Substitute and the limits into the formula:
This integral involves the square root of , which suggests a trigonometric substitution.
Let . This implies .
Differentiate to find :
Substitute into the square root term and simplify:
Now, change the limits of integration from to :
- When : . We can choose .
- When : . We can choose .
For in the interval , , so . Thus, .
Choosing the appropriate range for (typically for tangent substitution) ensures is positive.
Substitute , , and the new limits into the integral:
This shows that the arc length calculation requires the integral of .
From Part B, we found the indefinite integral:
Now we evaluate the definite integral . Let be the antiderivative part.
Let . We need .
Evaluate :
(Absolute value is dropped since ).
Evaluate :
Substitute the values back:
The arc length of the curve from to is .
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The region is defined by bounds on () and (). We are rotating this region about the y-axis.
When rotating a region defined by about the y-axis, the Method of Cylindrical Shells is typically the most straightforward approach.
The formula for the volume using cylindrical shells when rotating about the y-axis is:
In our case:
- The interval of integration is .
- The radius of a cylindrical shell at a given is simply .
- The height of the shell at is given by the function bounding the region from above, which is . So, .
Substitute the radius, height, and limits into the formula:
Factor out the constant and find the antiderivative of :
Now apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus:
We now have an expression for the volume in terms of the unknown upper limit .
We are given that the volume of the solid is . Set our expression for equal to this value:
Solve for . First, divide both sides by :
Add 1 to both sides:
Take the cube root of both sides:
The problem states that we need .
Since and , we know that is between 1 and 2. Specifically, .
Therefore, , and the condition is satisfied.
Always check if your solution for satisfies any constraints given in the problem statement (like here).
The value of such that the volume of revolution is is .

Figure: Rose
Tag:
A comprehensive "Filter by Tags" search feature is available on the course homepage, allowing you to find all exercises with this tag.
Prerequisites for this Exercise
No prerequisite skills selected yet.
The area of a region bounded by the polar curve from to is given by the area formula in polar coordinates:
The curve is . This is a polar rose curve. Since the coefficient of is (even), it has leaves.
A leaf starts and ends when the radius is zero. We need to find consecutive values of for which to determine the limits of integration for one leaf.
Set :
This occurs when the angle is an integer multiple of :
Solving for :
Let's find consecutive values:
- If , .
- If , .
The curve traces one full leaf as goes from to .
You can check that is positive for between and . For example, at , .
So, our limits of integration for one leaf are and .
Substitute , , and into the area formula:
To integrate , we use the power-reducing identity for sine.
Recall the identity: . In our case, , so .
Substitute the identity into the integral:
Find the antiderivative of :
The integral of is .
The integral of is .
So, the antiderivative is .
Now evaluate the definite integral using the limits and :
Since and :
The area contained in a single leaf of the polar curve is .